Core Scientific, Inc. (CORZ)
Nasdaq · Finance Services · Finance, insurance and real estate · CIK 1839341 · fiscal year ends in Dec
Closing price $15.02 on 28 Oct 2026; 52-week range $13.11 to $29.16.
Key figures
The last twelve months reported, with the latest price and balance sheet.
- Revenue, last twelve months
- $440.3M
- Revenue growth
- 26.4%
- Gross margin
- 28.3%
- Free cash flow
- -$957.7M
- Market value
- $4.8B
- Cash
- $1.8B
- Debt
- $4.3B
- Shares outstanding
- 319.6M
Financial statements
Revenue, profit and cash flow by fiscal year, each year linked to its annual report.
| Fiscal year | Year end | Revenue | Operating income | Net income | EPS | Free cash flow | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 31 Dec 2025 | $319.0M | -$245.6M | -$288.6M | -$0.88 | -$450.8M | 10-K filed 2 Mar 2026 |
| FY2024 | 31 Dec 2024 | $510.7M | -$142.1M | -$1.4B | -$4.39 | -$52.1M | 10-K filed 27 Feb 2025 |
| FY2023 | 31 Dec 2023 | $502.4M | $9.0M | -$246.5M | -$0.65 | $49.0M | 10-K filed 13 Mar 2024 |
| FY2022 | 31 Dec 2022 | $640.3M | -$2.1B | -$2.1B | -$6.30 | -$178.8M | 10-K filed 4 Apr 2023 |
| FY2021 | 31 Dec 2021 | $544.5M | $131.5M | $47.3M | $0.20 | -$56.7M | 10-K filed 4 Apr 2023 |
By quarter
| Quarter | Quarter end | Revenue | Net income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 FY2026 | 30 Jun 2026 | $164.2M | -$1.2B | -$3.32 |
| Q1 FY2026 | 31 Mar 2026 | $115.2M | -$347.2M | -$1.06 |
| Q4 FY2025 | 31 Dec 2025 | $79.8M | – | – |
| Q3 FY2025 | 30 Sep 2025 | $81.1M | -$144.0M | -$0.45 |
| Q2 FY2025 | 30 Jun 2025 | $78.6M | -$936.8M | -$0.04 |
| Q1 FY2025 | 31 Mar 2025 | $79.5M | $576.3M | $1.25 |
| Q4 FY2024 | 31 Dec 2024 | $94.9M | -$291.1M | -$0.60 |
| Q3 FY2024 | 30 Sep 2024 | $95.4M | -$455.3M | -$1.17 |
What the company said with its results
From the second quarter 2026 results, filed 28 July 2026.
- Revenue rose to $164.2 million. Total revenue was $164.2 million, up from $115.2 million in the first quarter and $78.6 million a year earlier. Colocation revenue was $136.7 million, against $77.5 million in the first quarter.
- Colocation drove most of the increase. Colocation revenue accounted for most of the increase. Digital asset self-mining revenue fell to $21.5 million from $30.1 million in the first quarter, and hosted mining revenue from customers was $6.0 million.
- Net loss widened to $1,155.3 million. Net loss was $1,155.3 million, or $(3.32) per share, against $347.2 million in the first quarter and $936.8 million a year earlier.
- Adjusted EBITDA reached $41.1 million. Adjusted EBITDA was $41.1 million. This release shows first-quarter Adjusted EBITDA as $8.9 million, while the first-quarter release reported $4.4 million.
- Colocation gross margin reached 59%. Colocation gross profit was $80.0 million, with gross margin of 59%, against 57% in the first quarter and 11% a year earlier.
- Self-mining gross loss was smaller. Digital asset self-mining gross loss was $(12.2) million, a margin of (56)%, compared with (57)% in the first quarter. Hosted mining gross profit was $2.2 million at a 37% margin.
- Eleven facilities across seven states. Facilities are in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Texas, the same site count as the first-quarter release.
- License fees led colocation revenue. License fees were $98.8 million of colocation revenue for the quarter, against $59.2 million in the first quarter.
- Power fees passed through to customers. Power fees passed through to customers were $35.1 million in the quarter, up from $21.1 million in the first quarter.
- Hosted mining revenue eased slightly. Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers was $6.0 million, against $7.6 million in the first quarter and $5.6 million a year earlier.
- Colocation cost of services rose. Total cost of colocation services was $56.7 million, against $33.6 million in the first quarter, as colocation revenue grew.
- Site startup costs rose to $27.0 million. Colocation organizational and site startup costs were $27.0 million, compared with $8.7 million in the first quarter and $11.7 million a year earlier.
- Selling and administrative costs were $49.4 million. Selling, general and administrative expense was $49.4 million, compared with $45.2 million in the first quarter and $45.3 million a year earlier.
- Consolidated gross margin reached 43%. Consolidated gross margin was 43%, against 26% in the first quarter, after the first-quarter impairment of $266.5 million was not repeated.
Company events
The newest 8-K filings of 167 held.
| Filed | Form | Event | Items |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Sep 2026 | 8-K | Investor update | 7.01 |
| 27 Aug 2026 | 8-K | Material agreement, New debt, Investor update | 1.01, 2.03, 7.01, 9.01 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 8-K | Investor update, Other events | 7.01, 8.01, 9.01 |
| 29 Jul 2026 | 8-K | Leadership change, Investor update | 5.02, 7.01, 9.01 |
| 28 Jul 2026 | 8-K | Results, Investor update | 2.02, 7.01, 9.01 |
| 28 Jul 2026 | 8-K | Share sale, Investor update | 3.02, 7.01, 9.01 |
| 26 May 2026 | 8-K | Leadership change, Investor update | 5.02, 7.01, 9.01 |
| 15 May 2026 | 8-K | Shareholder vote | 5.07 |
| 6 May 2026 | 8-K | Results, Investor update | 2.02, 7.01, 9.01 |
| 6 May 2026 | 8-K | Material agreement, Agreement ended, New debt, Other events | 1.01, 1.02, 2.03, 8.01, 9.01 |
| 6 May 2026 | 8-K | Material agreement, Investor update | 1.01, 7.01, 9.01 |
| 5 May 2026 | 8-K | Leadership change | 5.02, 9.01 |
Every filing
The newest filings with the SEC of 328 held.
| Filed | Form | Period |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sep 2026 | 8-K | 10 Sep 2026 |
| 27 Aug 2026 | 8-K | 25 Aug 2026 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 8-K | 13 Aug 2026 |
| 29 Jul 2026 | 8-K | 29 Jul 2026 |
| 28 Jul 2026 | 10-Q | 30 Jun 2026 |
| 28 Jul 2026 | 8-K | 28 Jul 2026 |
| 28 Jul 2026 | 8-K | 27 Jul 2026 |
| 26 May 2026 | 8-K | 26 May 2026 |
| 15 May 2026 | 8-K | 12 May 2026 |
| 6 May 2026 | 10-Q | 31 Mar 2026 |
| 6 May 2026 | 8-K | 6 May 2026 |
| 6 May 2026 | 8-K | 22 Apr 2026 |
Insider trades
Form 4 trades by officers, directors and 10% owners, last 12 months.
| Traded | Insider | Type | Shares | Price | Value | Held after | Form 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 4,500 | $13.27 | $59.7K | 1,138,786 | 28 Oct 2026 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 5,500 | $13.80 | $75.9K | 1,133,286 | 28 Oct 2026 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 10,000 | $13.87 | $138.7K | 1,143,286 | 20 Oct 2026 |
| 12 Oct 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 10,000 | $15.12 | $151.2K | 1,159,668 | 14 Oct 2026 |
| 5 Oct 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 10,000 | $16.31 | $163.1K | 1,169,668 | 7 Oct 2026 |
| 28 Sep 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 10,000 | $16.76 | $167.6K | 1,187,896 | 30 Sep 2026 |
| 21 Sep 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 10,000 | $18.37 | $183.7K | 1,197,896 | 23 Sep 2026 |
| 15 Sep 2026 | Weiss Eric Stanton, Director | Purchase | 6,000 | $16.33 | $98.0K | 265,262 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| 14 Sep 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 10,000 | $17.14 | $171.4K | 1,207,896 | 16 Sep 2026 |
| 8 Sep 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 10,000 | $18.67 | $186.7K | 1,217,896 | 10 Sep 2026 |
| 31 Aug 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 10,000 | $16.23 | $162.3K | 1,927,896 | 2 Sep 2026 |
| 24 Aug 2026 | Duchene Todd M, See remarks | Sale under a trading plan | 10,000 | $17.45 | $174.5K | 1,937,896 | 26 Aug 2026 |
Planned insider sales
Form 144 notices, filed when the sell order goes to the broker.
| Filed | Seller | Shares | Value | Planned sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | TODD DUCHENE REVOCABLE TRUST, Officer | 140,000 | $2.2M | 12 Oct 2026 |
| 6 Jul 2026 | TODD DUCHENE REVOCABLE TRUST, Officer | 140,000 | $3.0M | 6 Jul 2026 |
| 1 Apr 2026 | TODD DUCHENE REVOCABLE TRUST, Officer | 140,000 | $2.1M | 1 Apr 2026 |
Large holders
Schedule 13D and 13G filings by holders of more than 5% of the voting shares.
| Filed | Holder | Schedule | Stake | Shares |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026 | Jericho Capital Asset Management L.P. | 13G | 7.2% | 22.9M |
| 14 Aug 2026 | Valiant Capital Management, L.P. | 13G amended | 5.3% | 17.0M |
| 14 Aug 2026 | Pentwater Capital Management LP | 13G amended | 0.4% | 1.3M |
| 12 Aug 2026 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC | 13G amended | 6.3% | 20.1M |
| 5 Aug 2026 | Citadel Securities GP LLC | 13G | 6.5% | 20.9M |
| 4 Aug 2026 | Situational Awareness LP | 13D amended | 4.4% | 14.1M |
| 31 Jul 2026 | Vanguard Capital Management | 13G | 5.09% | 16.2M |
| 26 May 2026 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC | 13G | 7.5% | 24.0M |
| 15 May 2026 | G1 Execution Services, LLC | 13G amended | 4.6% | 14.6M |
| 15 May 2026 | Citadel Securities GP LLC | 13G amended | 4.1% | 12.8M |
Short interest
Shares sold short and not yet bought back, on each FINRA settlement date.
| Settlement | Shares short | Change | Days to cover |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | 76.6M | +16.13% | 5.16 |
| 30 Sep 2026 | 66.0M | +4.53% | 5.8 |
| 15 Sep 2026 | 63.1M | -2.56% | 5.86 |
| 31 Aug 2026 | 64.8M | +2.13% | 5.88 |
| 14 Aug 2026 | 63.4M | +0.48% | 5.14 |
| 31 Jul 2026 | 63.1M | -0.35% | 4.57 |
| 15 Jul 2026 | 63.4M | -8.3% | 5.74 |
| 30 Jun 2026 | 69.1M | -7.53% | 5.58 |
Funds that hold it
From each fund's latest Form 13F.
477 funds held it at 30 Jun 2026: 215 added and 124 trimmed in the quarter. The largest:
| Fund | Shares | Value | Change in the quarter |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc. | 28,122,262 | $719.6M | +3,492,391 |
| Situational Awareness LP | 26,008,473 | $665.6M | 0 |
| Jericho Capital Asset Management L.P. | 22,882,942 | $585.6M | +11,159,492 |
| Vanguard Portfolio Management LLC | 18,661,783 | $477.6M | +47,247 |
| UBS Group AG | 15,889,496 | $406.6M | -9,644,444 |
| Vanguard Capital Management LLC | 13,797,507 | $353.1M | +432,618 |
| Two Sigma Investments, LP | 10,275,907 | $263.0M | +4,689,937 |
| Geode Capital Management, LLC | 8,495,597 | $244.6M | +691,916 |
| Value Aligned Research Advisors, LLC | 9,187,797 | $235.1M | +1,468,835 |
| Two Seas Capital LP | 9,028,509 | $231.0M | -7,123,324 |
Peers
Companies in the same industry.
- American Express Co. (AXP): revenue $77.6B, market value $213.5B
- Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU): revenue $15.8B, market value $58.1B
- Strategy Inc. (MSTR): revenue $498.3M, market value $51.2B
- Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN): revenue $6.3B, market value $42.8B
- Synchrony Financial (SYF): revenue $15.0B, market value $23.4B
- SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI): revenue $4.3B, market value $22.1B
- Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL): revenue $2.9B, market value $22.0B
- Chime Financial, Inc. (CHYM): revenue $2.5B, market value $11.3B
- Iren Ltd. (IREN): revenue $707.0M, market value $10.3B
- Hut 8 Corp. (HUT): revenue $318.0M, market value $8.6B
What the company does
Core Scientific designs, builds and operates purpose-built data centers that provide high-density colocation services and digital asset mining, mainly for its own account and to a lesser extent for third-party customers. The facilities are built for power-intensive computing, with a focus on artificial intelligence (AI) and other high-performance computing (HPC) workloads. As of 31 December 2025 it owned or leased ten data centers across seven United States states, with about 1.4 gigawatts of gross utility power capacity, or about 920 megawatts (MW) of total leasable customer power capacity. The company began in 2017 by building sites for bitcoin mining and for hosting other miners. In 2025 most of its revenue still came from earning bitcoin for its own account.
How the business is organised
The company reports three segments. Colocation provides space, power, cooling, facilities operations and security to third parties running AI and HPC workloads. Digital Asset Self-Mining runs the company's own fleet of mining computers. Digital Asset Hosted Mining hosts mining equipment owned by other parties. In 2025 these segments made up 20%, 72% and 8% of total revenue respectively.
Colocation customers pay fixed amounts based on electric capacity plus variable usage-based charges. Power fees are passed through to customers without markup. In self-mining, the company's machines join a pool that validates transactions on the Bitcoin network, and the company receives bitcoin as a reward. Hosted mining customers get deployment, monitoring, troubleshooting, maintenance and electrical power for their machines, and are billed mainly on power capacity or consumption under terms of one to three years.
The company says it intends to convert every megawatt in its portfolio to high-density colocation over the next three years. It says it will keep mining during conversion only to meet existing power commitments or a small number of hosting commitments. It also says it does not expect to expand hosted mining further.
Where it operates
The ten data centers are in Alabama (1), Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North Carolina (1), North Dakota (1), Oklahoma (1) and Texas (3).
- Denton Municipal Electric, 394 MW, Dallas-Denton, Texas - Texas New-Mexico Power, 300 MW, Pecos, Texas - Dalton Utilities, 195 MW, Dalton, Georgia - Tennessee Valley Authority, 150 MW, Paducah-Calvert City, Kentucky - Nodak Electric Cooperative, 100 MW, Grand Forks, North Dakota - Oklahoma Gas & Electric, 100 MW, Muskogee, Oklahoma - Duke Energy, 82 MW, and Murphy Electric Power Board, 35 MW, Marble, North Carolina - Alabama Power Company, 50 MW, Auburn, Alabama - Austin Energy, 20 MW, Austin, Texas
Of the 920 MW of total leasable customer power capacity, 590 MW is leased under signed contracts, 330 MW is unleased and 120 MW was billable at year end. The company has fixed, variable and interruptible power supply agreements, and its data centers have backup generators for critical facility infrastructure.
Who it sells to
The company's colocation work is mostly wholesale, which typically means long agreements with a limited number of customers, often with initial terms of 10 years or more. The company describes its colocation contracts as spanning 10+ years. A contract signed in February 2024 covered 16 MW at the Austin, Texas facility, and another in June 2024 covered 200 MW. Contractual options since then brought leased capacity under the relationship to about 590 MW.
The company says it targets hyperscale cloud providers, neoclouds and enterprises for further colocation customers. It also says it is evaluating acquisitions of new sites, including land and power capacity.
Mining operations
As of 31 December 2025 the company had about 151,400 bitcoin miners deployed. Of these, about 135,500 were its own machines, representing 15.7 exahash per second, and about 15,900 were hosted machines, representing 2.2 exahash per second. It has historically bought substantially all of its miners from Bitmain Technologies Limited. In 2024 it also agreed to acquire 3 nm chips customized for bitcoin mining from Block. Electricity is the major operating cost of the mining fleet.
How it competes
The company describes both the colocation and bitcoin mining markets as highly competitive. In colocation it names rivals including Aligned Data Centers, Compass Datacenters, Equinix, Digital Realty Trust, NTT, QTS, Switch, Vantage Data Centers and CyrusOne. It also names miners that are converting sites for AI and HPC customers, including Applied Digital, Cipher Mining, Galaxy Digital, Hut 8, IREN and Terawulf. Competitors compete on price, facility location, reputation and perceived skill, and for the same power, equipment and customers.
In self-mining the company competes on its number of miners, its hash rate, the size and skill of its mining pool and the efficiency of its operations.
People, patents and rules
The company had 325 full-time employees on 31 December 2025, located in 26 states. None are represented by a labor union. It has filed over 130 patent applications covering areas such as blockchain, data center management, infrastructure and cooling.
State rules affect its sites. Texas Senate Bill 6 applies to customers with loads above 75 megawatts at a single site within the Electric Reliability Council of Texas region. It requires those customers to share transmission interconnection costs and to maintain backup generation or load curtailment capability. Under the company's colocation customer agreements, curtailment ordered by a grid operator counts as a force majeure event.
*From Core Scientific's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended 31 December 2025. [The filing](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1839341/000162828026013305/core-20251231.htm)*
From the company's 10-K.